1. Chapters in Section V identify trends and issues in IDT in various
contexts: business & industry; military; health care education; P-12
education; and post-secondary education. Select 2 of these 5 contexts and
compare/contrast the IDT trends and issues. Then describe how knowledge of IDT
trends and issues you captured from those two fields can better inform your
work.
After reading the chapters, I decided to focus on the military and
education environment, because both of these environments use instructional
design for training and performance improvement. In education, we use
instructional design to document, evaluate, and monitor student performance.
The ‘how’ we do this is constantly changing, but I believe that we will always
use instructional design to support our students. I enjoyed reading about the
military instructional design, because I feel like I can really connect. Their
design is focused on meeting a need. They do not waste time with training. They
have ‘guiding documents’ that say what their objectives and goals are, which
helps to direct their trainings. I think as teachers we can all relate to this,
especially during evaluation season. The education field and military field
share the same major concern, budgets. They both have procedures in place for
how to order new and improved devices, but it is a rigorously long procedure.
(In my district, you have to beg, plead, and get the principal to complain
before your technology need is even noticed.) This is similar to the Marines,
who struggle to get new technology in their department. As I’ve discussed in
all my posts, I have been struggling with making trainings necessary, or
seemingly necessary, and seeing that the military and education has to make
sure to meet the needs of their trainees. This shows me I need to focus more on
observations. What are teachers doing in class? What can I do to help? What
will ‘lighten their load’? These questions can help direct my trainings, so
that I can make sure I do not waste time.
2. Chapters in Section VI discuss global trends and issues in
IDT. What have you learned from the selected chapter and how can/will it
enhance your teaching? In a global and more connected society, we face
unprecedented challenges that have implications for learning. How and can we prepare
our youth to develop cultural sensitivity when working with people from the
another (or your selected) region? Does our current education system,
curriculum, and instructional practices help learners foster the skills
necessary to tackle these issues? What can be done in your role?
The
first thing that came to mind when I read about global trends, is that it is
the teacher’s job to create 21st century learners in his/her
classroom. Through this, teachers are creating global citizens. I think we lose
sight of that, because it’s not a tested TEKS, or because it’s not readily
available. This is so sad, because students go without the necessary skill sets
needed to be in a real world setting. Our teachers just aren’t prepared or
given enough time to teach these necessary cultural skills. The first lesson
that comes to mind when trying to develop cultural sensitivity through
technology, would be to have students communicate with students around the
world. This can be done through skype. Students could be connected to a
classroom in China for example and discuss the different cultures, or students
could just be email pen-pals to students all over the world and discuss the
cultural differences. In my current role, I could address and research easy
ways to create an environment of cultural sensitivity, as well as just being a
role model in that field. Our students grasp a lot of what we teach, by just
observing us.
It is interesting that you should say that education will always use instructional design. I just read an article in the New York Times explaining how Georgia Tech has come up with the first master's program that not only cut costs drastically but it will also be only online. This is to cut costs and to reach an audience a larger audience that comprises mostly of working adults looking to get a leg up in the job market.
ReplyDeleteI agree that the military wastes no time on their objectives for training. I think this goes waaaay back to WW1 but now it is with more technology today than they had back then and of course more information available to them.
"What will ‘lighten their load’?"
ReplyDeleteIf you can figure this out, communicate it to the teachers and then make it really happen, you will have them beating down your door to get the trainings you offer. I have found so often that the sessions that make these claims are really just the same old book with new cover. And, usually, rather than making things easier they just add more to an already overloaded plate.
I agree that more connectedness with students around the world is needed to make our students more prepared for the world outside of school. And, I have tried repeatedly to integrates such communicative activities in my classes. However, I have always run into these issues: 1) "You can't use Skype because it might violate student privacy" 2) "Students aren't allowed to use email on the school network, it might open the system to virus infections" 3) "You can't require students to do anything online or technological outside of school because someone may not have the necessary access."
I even tried to set up a Skype co-teaching semester with a fellow teacher from the town I grew up in in south Texas. We had discussed it and were both ready to start. But, the administration at both schools said that they couldn't allow it because of "many reasons too detailed to go into." Some of the students in each class still managed to connect and communicate outside of school. So, they got some benefit from it.
Strong posts in this group. As you wrestle with the often conflicting demands of instructional design and loads of gray areas, rely on the literature to guide you and reference it specifically so other designers know where they can go to learn more. As designers, it's also critical to grasp the context of a given instructional problem so that barriers to diffusion of innovation (Rogers, 2003) can be overcome or at least anticipated and included in the informal knowledge of the knowledge management plan.
ReplyDelete(Rogers, 2003). Diffusion of innovations. New York: The Free Press.